Dear all,
Dr Pulvermuller will be giving a talk on Thursday the 1st of March
at 4PM at YNic (tomorrow).
Here goes his abstract
Early time course of psycholinguistic information access in the brain
as revealed by neurophysiological imaging (EEG and MEG)
Friedemann Pulvermüller, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit,
Cambridge, UK, friedemann.pulvermuller(a)mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk
The main stream view in neurophysiological psycholinguistics has been
that relatively late components of the brain response with latencies
of 300-500 ms reflect higher stages of language processing, such as
lexical access, semantic processing and context integration. This
view is in contrast with data from psycholinguistics indicating very
early psycholinguistic information access. Why, then, would ERP
studies reveal late neurophysiological effects, but not the early
ones psycholinguistic behavioral work would suggest? As language
stimuli are very variable physically and psycholinguistically, the
early components of the linguistic brain response, which are both
focal and short-lived, may fall victim to the neurophysiological
reflection of such stimulus variance [1]. Studies keeping stimulus
variance to a minimum [2-3] or using new paradigms and analysis
techniques [4-5] reported early (<250 ms) near-simultaneous effects
of lexical and semantic processing in word recognition. The talk will
discuss these effects, using neurophysiological data to judge
linguistic models of the time course of psycholinguistic information
access. A neurobiological model will be used to account for both the
near-simultaneity of psycholinguistic information access as well as
the minimal time delays observed. Distributed cell assemblies with
specific cortical topographies binding information about word form
and meaning may be the basis of near-synchrony and precise spatio-
temporal patterning [5-7].
[1] Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253-336.
[2] Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W., et al. (1995).
Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types.
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 357-370.
[3] Pulvermüller, F., Assadollahi, R., & Elbert, T. (2001).
Neuromagnetic evidence for early semantic access in word recognition.
European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(1), 201-205.
[4] Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-
Wilson, W. (2006). The time course of visual word-recognition as
revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, in
press.
[5] Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and
action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576-582.
[6] Pulvermüller, F. (2006). Word processing in the brain as revealed
by neurophysiological imaging using EEG and MEG. In G. Gaskell (Ed.),
Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. in press). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
[7] Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2006). Language outside the
focus of attention: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying
higher cognitive processes. Progress in Neurobiology, 79, 49-71.
Silvia Gennari
Department of Psychology
University of York
Heslington, York
YO10 5DD
United Kingdom